• About
  • Selected Personal Works
  • Blog
  • Press
Menu

CEB

Experiential Producer, Director & Artist
  • About
  • Selected Personal Works
  • Blog
  • Press

Gallery Visit + Class 1 Readings

January 29, 2017

Alex, Lindsey and myself took the trip up to the Upper West Side to go to the American Folk Art Museum to visit the Securing the Shadow: Posthumous Portraiture in America exhibit. The exhibit displayed posthumous portraits of, most often, young children of the 18th and 19th centuries. All of the paintings were described, in great detail, but only what was pictured within the painting. Many of the descriptions talked about the animals, toys and environment the child was painted with and in, but one piece of the story was often left out --- the reason for death. Is this something that was to be forgotten? Was the painting to be the only story that was carried forward of the child? To preserve identity?

Another thing I noticed was often there were different motifs in the paintings as to indicated further that the child was deceased: sun setting, specific types of flowers that are known to shrivel at the end of the day, books that read 'remember me' on the spine, many loose strings indicating that the thread of life cut too short. I'm curious why it was important to include these symbols in the painting.  Were the paintings often displayed in a public location within the house, and so that the guests wouldn't be confused, was it important that these motifs were included? To be sure the proper story was portrayed? I'm unsure, but I thought it was interesting.

I wonder how frequently this type of portraiture spread in popularity over the years? Did it become a popular occurrence over time? Did visiting friends see the portrait in the hallway and decided that they wanted to do this for their children if they ever passed because they felt it was a great way to remember their story? How did this trend catch on? Did the visiting friend remember the story of the deceased child better because of the painting? In Chapter 3 of Narrative and Intelligence, they talk about how we remember stories and it might be relevant in analyzing this situation:

"We do not easily remember what other people have said if they do not tell it in the form of a story... More often than not, other people's stories don't have the richness of detail and emotional impact that allows them to be stored in multiple ways in our memories"

With that quote in mind, it seems that the detailed portraitures were used to preserve identity so that their story would not be lost in the years and centuries to come.

In Collective Narrative
← Class 1 - History of Fairy TalesHourly Comic →

VR / AR / MR

LIVE PERFORMANCE

INSTALLATION


SPRING 2018

Thesis

Advisor: Kat Sullivan

Fall 2017

Designing for Live Performance
Teacher: Andrew Lazarow

Bodies In Motion
Teachers: Todd Bryant & Kat Sullivan

Alt Docs
Teachers: Julia Irwin & Ziv Schneider

Temporary Expert
Teacher: Marina Zurkow

Automated Video
Teacher: Sam Levine


Spring 2017

Collective Narrative
Teacher: Marianne Petit

Directing Virtual Reality
Teachers: Sarah Rothberg & Carol L Dysinger

Doing Good is Good Business - Designing for UNICEF
Teachers: Benedetta Piantella & Christopher Fabian

Fairytales in the 21st Century
Teacher: Marianne Petit

Nothing - Creating Illusions
Teacher: Andrew Lazarow


Fall 2016

Animation
Teacher: Gabe Barcia-Colombo

Fabrication
Teacher: Ben Light

Intro to Computational Media
Teacher: Allison Perrish

Physical Computing
Teacher: Danny Rozin

Visual Language
Teacher: Katherine Dillon